DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover 400 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationGeo Storm
RoverMakeGeo
400ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationGeo Storm
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
111 HPPower130 HP
137 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationGeo Storm
4370 mmLength4150 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1300 mm
1075 KgWeight1010 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover 400 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…