2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.8 i 16V (145 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
RoverMakeLand Rover
25ModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
7,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
145 HPPower117 HP
174 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
3990 mmLength4368 mm
1688 mmWidth1809 mm
1417 mmHeight1708 mm
1090 KgWeight1510 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…