2003 • Alfa Romeo
147
Alfa Romeo 147 1.9 JTD (115 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.8 i 16V (145 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 147
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationRover 25
Alfa RomeoMakeRover
147Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationRover 25
9,9 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
191 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
115 HPPower145 HP
275 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationRover 25
4170 mmLength3990 mm
1729 mmWidth1688 mm
1439 mmHeight1417 mm
1345 KgWeight1090 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…