DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 25
BMWMakeRover
Z3Model25
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 25
10,4 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
118 HPPower145 HP
190 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 25
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 25
4050 mmLength3990 mm
1740 mmWidth1688 mm
1288 mmHeight1417 mm
1220 KgWeight1090 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…