DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
LagunaModel25
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
202 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1783 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower117 HP
165 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength3990 mm
1750 mmWidth1688 mm
1430 mmHeight1419 mm
1225 KgWeight1135 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…