2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.6 i 16V (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Honda
Civic
Honda Civic 1.6 16V (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
RoverMakeHonda
25ModelCivic
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
109 HPPower116 HP
138 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
3990 mmLength4325 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1390 mm
1105 KgWeight1155 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…