DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeRover
AlhambraModel25
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
172 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
235 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength3990 mm
1810 mmWidth1688 mm
1728 mmHeight1417 mm
1754 KgWeight1105 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…