DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 25 vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
RoverMakeRover
25Model25
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
138 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
3990 mmLength3990 mm
1688 mmWidth1688 mm
1417 mmHeight1417 mm
1105 KgWeight1105 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 25 and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…