DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 2
RoverMakeMazda
25Model2
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 2
10,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
103 HPPower68 HP
123 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationMazda 2
3990 mmLength3925 mm
1688 mmWidth1680 mm
1417 mmHeight1545 mm
1105 KgWeight1085 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…