2003 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI (80 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Volkswagen Polo vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 25
VolkswagenMakeRover
PoloModel25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 25
13,6 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
170 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
80 HPPower103 HP
195 NmTorque123 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationRover 25
3743 mmLength3990 mm
1632 mmWidth1688 mm
1418 mmHeight1417 mm
1035 KgWeight1105 Kg
2407 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volkswagen Polo and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…