DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 25 vs 2000 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 45

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationRover 45
RoverMakeRover
25Model45
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationRover 45
10,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
103 HPPower103 HP
123 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationRover 45
3990 mmLength4517 mm
1688 mmWidth1696 mm
1417 mmHeight1395 mm
1105 KgWeight1180 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 25 and 2000 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 45 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…