DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 25 vs 1999 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
RoverMakeRover
25Model25
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
103 HPPower103 HP
123 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationRover 25
3990 mmLength3990 mm
1688 mmWidth1688 mm
1417 mmHeight1417 mm
1105 KgWeight1105 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 25 and 1999 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…