DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover 200 vs 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMercedes-Benz
200ModelE Serisi
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
204 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank72 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3973 mmLength4765 mm
1688 mmWidth1765 mm
1419 mmHeight1490 mm
1135 KgWeight1470 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover 200 and 1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…