DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Discovery vs 1996 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRover
DiscoveryModel200
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
157 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
134 HPPower145 HP
312 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
89 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
14,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength3973 mm
1810 mmWidth1688 mm
1960 mmHeight1419 mm
2020 KgWeight1135 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Discovery and 1996 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…