DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi vs 1996 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeRover
E SerisiModel200
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
188 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
136 HPPower145 HP
190 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength3973 mm
1765 mmWidth1688 mm
1490 mmHeight1419 mm
1470 KgWeight1135 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi and 1996 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…