DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover 200 vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationMazda 323
RoverMakeMazda
200Model323
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationMazda 323
11,5 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
182 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
127 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationMazda 323
4220 mmLength4340 mm
1680 mmWidth1710 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1065 KgWeight1170 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover 200 and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…