DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1994 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 200
MazdaMakeRover
323Model200
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 200
14,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
170 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
82 HPPower103 HP
168 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 200
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14 STyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 200
4340 mmLength4220 mm
1710 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1390 mm
1170 KgWeight1065 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1994 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…