DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Ford Escort vs 1994 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRover
EscortModel200
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
172 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
90 HPPower103 HP
180 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4229 mmLength4220 mm
1690 mmWidth1680 mm
1397 mmHeight1390 mm
1130 KgWeight1065 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Ford Escort and 1994 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…