DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover 200 vs 1994 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
200ModelEscort
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
182 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
103 HPPower90 HP
127 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4220 mmLength4229 mm
1680 mmWidth1690 mm
1390 mmHeight1397 mm
1065 KgWeight1130 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover 200 and 1994 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…