1990 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1990Overall Score50.25/100
1990 Rover 200 vs 1990 Renault Super 5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Renault
Super 5
Renault Super 5 1.7 i (C409) 1990Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Rover 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 200SpecificationRenault Super 5
RoverMakeRenault
200ModelSuper 5
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
3/5Doors2
Performance
Rover 200SpecificationRenault Super 5
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
182 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1721 cc
103 HPPower94 HP
127 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 200SpecificationRenault Super 5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 200SpecificationRenault Super 5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/55 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Rover 200SpecificationRenault Super 5
4220 mmLength—
1680 mmWidth—
1390 mmHeight—
1065 KgWeight—
2550 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Rover 200 and 1990 Renault Super 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…