DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Renault Super 5 vs 1990 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
Super 5Model200
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4+1Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1721 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
94 HPPower103 HP
143 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4220 mm
—Width1680 mm
—Height1390 mm
—Weight1065 Kg
—Wheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Renault Super 5 and 1990 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…