DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Opel Corsa vs 1990 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 200
OpelMakeRover
CorsaModel200
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 200
9,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
186 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
98 HPPower103 HP
132 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 200
3622 mmLength4220 mm
1532 mmWidth1680 mm
1365 mmHeight1390 mm
820 KgWeight1065 Kg
2343 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Opel Corsa and 1990 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…