DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover 200 vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 100
RoverMakeAudi
200Model100
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 100
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
182 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
103 HPPower90 HP
127 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 100
4220 mmLength4793 mm
1680 mmWidth1814 mm
1390 mmHeight1421 mm
1065 KgWeight1160 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover 200 and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…