DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Rover 200 vs 1990 Citroen AX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationCitroen AX
RoverMakeCitroen
200ModelAX
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationCitroen AX
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
182 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1294 cc
103 HPPower95 HP
127 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationCitroen AX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationCitroen AX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size165/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationCitroen AX
4220 mmLength3495 mm
1680 mmWidth1596 mm
1390 mmHeight1350 mm
1065 KgWeight715 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Rover 200 and 1990 Citroen AX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…