DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
TraficModel323
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
163 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower90 HP
190 NmTorque220 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4200 mm
1904 mmWidth1705 mm
1940 mmHeight1410 mm
1775 KgWeight1175 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…