DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeRenault
31ModelTrafic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
155 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2134 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
250 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength4782 mm
1800 mmWidth1904 mm
1422 mmHeight1940 mm
1560 KgWeight1775 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…