2003 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 DI (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
2003 Ford Mondeo vs 2003 Renault Trafic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Trafic
Renault Trafic 2.0 (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Renault Trafic
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationRenault Trafic
FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelTrafic
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationRenault Trafic
13,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
180 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower120 HP
245 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationRenault Trafic
DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank90 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationRenault Trafic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationRenault Trafic
4731 mmLength4782 mm
1812 mmWidth1904 mm
1429 mmHeight1940 mm
1492 KgWeight1775 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase3098 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Mondeo and 2003 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…