DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
ScenicModelVectra
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
170 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
98 HPPower122 HP
250 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4596 mm
1775 mmWidth1798 mm
1720 mmHeight1460 mm
1485 KgWeight1395 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…