DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
MGMakeRenault
ZSModelScenic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
9,0 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
19 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
117 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Scenic
4520 mmLength4425 mm
1700 mmWidth1775 mm
1390 mmHeight1720 mm
1125 KgWeight1485 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…