DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space StarModelScenic
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
112 HPPower98 HP
157 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4425 mm
1715 mmWidth1775 mm
1515 mmHeight1720 mm
1235 KgWeight1485 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…