DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Scenic vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModel6
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
170 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
98 HPPower120 HP
250 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4700 mm
1775 mmWidth1780 mm
1720 mmHeight1480 mm
1485 KgWeight1335 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Scenic and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…