DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Megane vs 2014 Toyota GT 86 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeToyota
MeganeModelGT 86
2012Model year2014
CoupeBody typeCoupe
5Seats—
3Doors—

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
245 km/hTop speed226 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
250 HPPower200 HP
340 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
225/40 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4240 mm
—Width1775 mm
1435 mmHeight1285 mm
1387 KgWeight1287 kg
—Luggage capacity218 lt
2636 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Megane and 2014 Toyota GT 86 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…