DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Toyota GT 86 vs 2012 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRenault
GT 86ModelMegane
2014Model year2012
CoupeBody typeCoupe
—Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
226 km/hTop speed245 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower250 HP
205 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4240 mmLength4299 mm
1775 mmWidth—
1285 mmHeight1435 mm
1287 kgWeight1387 Kg
218 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2636 mm

Additional Features

Toyota GT 86Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsLight SensorFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Toyota GT 86 and 2012 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…