DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 KTM X-Bow vs 2012 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTMMakeRenault
X-BowModelMegane
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

3,9 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
220 km/hTop speed245 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
310 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size225/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3738 mmLength4299 mm
1915 mmWidth—
1202 mmHeight1435 mm
790 KgWeight1387 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 KTM X-Bow and 2012 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…