DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault KWID vs 2016 Opel Adam Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault KWID

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
KWIDModelAdam
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,9 s
135 km/hTop speed165 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement1229 cc
68 HPPower70 HP
91 NmTorque115 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
28 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption7,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
155/80 R13Tyre size16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3679 mmLength3698 mm
1579 mmWidth1720 mm
1478 mmHeight1484 mm
699 KgWeight1026 kg
—Luggage capacity170 lt
2422 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault KWID and 2016 Opel Adam approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault KWID leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…