DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Adam vs 2016 Renault KWID Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault KWID

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
AdamModelKWID
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed135 km/h
1229 ccEngine displacement999 cc
70 HPPower68 HP
115 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank28 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3698 mmLength3679 mm
1720 mmWidth1579 mm
1484 mmHeight1478 mm
1026 kgWeight699 Kg
170 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2422 mm

Additional Features

Opel AdamDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningAlloy WheelsUSB Port

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Adam and 2016 Renault KWID approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault KWID leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…