DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Polo vs 2016 Renault KWID Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault KWID

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRenault
PoloModelKWID
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed135 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement999 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
95 NmTorque91 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank28 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
14Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3972 mmLength3679 mm
1682 mmWidth1579 mm
1453 mmHeight1478 mm
1050 kgWeight699 Kg
280 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2422 mm

Additional Features

Volkswagen PoloDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Polo and 2016 Renault KWID approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault KWID leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…