DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Renault Kadjar vs 2017 Honda WR-V Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHonda
KadjarModelWR-V
2017Model year2017
CrossoverBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h—
181 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower100 HP
250 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
3,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7Gears6
EDCTransmission—
19Tyre size195/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4449 mmLength3999 mm
1836 mmWidth1734 mm
1607 mmHeight1601 mm
1407 kgWeight1176-1204 Kg
472 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2555 mm

Additional Features

Renault KadjarDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth
Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Renault Kadjar and 2017 Honda WR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…