DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda WR-V vs 2017 Renault Kadjar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
WR-VModelKadjar
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption3,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
—TransmissionEDC
195/60 R16Tyre size19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3999 mmLength4449 mm
1734 mmWidth1836 mm
1601 mmHeight1607 mm
1176-1204 KgWeight1407 kg
—Luggage capacity472 lt
2555 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

Renault KadjarDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda WR-V and 2017 Renault Kadjar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…