DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Figo vs 2017 Renault Kadjar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
FigoModelKadjar
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
100 HPPower110 HP
215 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption3,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears7
—TransmissionEDC
175/65 R14Tyre size19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4449 mm
1695 mmWidth1836 mm
1525 mmHeight1607 mm
—Weight1407 kg
—Luggage capacity472 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Renault KadjarDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Figo and 2017 Renault Kadjar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…