DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Clio vs 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ClioModel166
2003Model year2005
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
235 km/hTop speed241 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
226 HPPower220 HP
300 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption18,3 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4720 mm
1810 mmWidth1815 mm
1360 mmHeight1406 mm
1335 KgWeight1510 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Clio and 2005 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…