2005 • Alfa Romeo
166
Alfa Romeo 166 3.0 i V6 24V (220 Hp) 2005Overall Score71.5/100
2005 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 3.0 V6 (226 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 166
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 166SpecificationRenault Clio
Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
166ModelClio
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Alfa Romeo 166SpecificationRenault Clio
7,9 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
241 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
220 HPPower226 HP
265 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 166SpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank61 lt
18,3 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 166SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 166SpecificationRenault Clio
4720 mmLength3800 mm
1815 mmWidth1810 mm
1406 mmHeight1360 mm
1510 KgWeight1335 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…