DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mondeo vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelClio
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
243 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
226 HPPower226 HP
270 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,3 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength3800 mm
1812 mmWidth1810 mm
1429 mmHeight1360 mm
1420 KgWeight1335 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mondeo and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…