DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Clio vs 2005 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelMondeo
2003Model year2005
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
235 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
226 HPPower226 HP
300 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank58 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4731 mm
1810 mmWidth1812 mm
1360 mmHeight1429 mm
1335 KgWeight1420 Kg
2511 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Clio and 2005 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…