DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelScenic
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
98 HPPower95 HP
127 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4168 mm
1640 mmWidth1719 mm
1417 mmHeight1609 mm
965 KgWeight1235 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…