2000 • Holden
Barina
Holden Barina 1.4 i 16V Swing (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Holden Barina vs 1999 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.4 16V (B/CB0L) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Holden Barina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden BarinaSpecificationRenault Clio
HoldenMakeRenault
BarinaModelClio
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Holden BarinaSpecificationRenault Clio
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
125 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden BarinaSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden BarinaSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
165/70 R13 TTyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden BarinaSpecificationRenault Clio
3741 mmLength3773 mm
1608 mmWidth1640 mm
1420 mmHeight1417 mm
1420 KgWeight965 Kg
2443 mmWheelbase2475 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Holden Barina and 1999 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…