DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 1999 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ScenicModelClio
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
95 HPPower98 HP
127 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4168 mmLength3773 mm
1719 mmWidth1640 mm
1609 mmHeight1417 mm
1235 KgWeight965 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 1999 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…