1996 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 i (58 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
1996 Renault Clio vs 2000 Seat Arosa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationSeat Arosa
RenaultMakeSeat
ClioModelArosa
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationSeat Arosa
14,0 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
155 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1171 ccEngine displacement1191 cc
58 HPPower61 HP
84 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationSeat Arosa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption2,7 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13 STyre size155/65R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationSeat Arosa
3709 mmLength3529 mm
1616 mmWidth1621 mm
1395 mmHeight1455 mm
830 KgWeight860 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2319 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Renault Clio and 2000 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…