2000 • Volkswagen
Lupo
Volkswagen Lupo 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Lupo vs 1996 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 i (58 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Lupo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen LupoSpecificationRenault Clio
VolkswagenMakeRenault
LupoModelClio
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Volkswagen LupoSpecificationRenault Clio
14,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
165 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1171 cc
61 HPPower58 HP
140 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen LupoSpecificationRenault Clio
DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank43 lt
3,7 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
3,0 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen LupoSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size155/70 R13 S
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volkswagen LupoSpecificationRenault Clio
3529 mmLength3709 mm
1620 mmWidth1616 mm
1470 mmHeight1395 mm
830 KgWeight830 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2472 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Lupo and 1996 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Lupo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…