DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Saxo vs 1996 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeRenault
SaxoModelClio
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
162 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1171 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
94 NmTorque84 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/70 R13 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3709 mm
1595 mmWidth1616 mm
1390 mmHeight1395 mm
780 KgWeight830 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Saxo and 1996 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…